Orienteering USA

Dear OUSA community,

Orienteering USA is exploring ways to preserve and share the history of our sport by digitizing past issues of Orienteering North America (ONA) for inclusion in an online OUSA library.

As many of you know, ONA – and before it Orienteering USA (the publication, not the federation) – was for decades a vital link connecting orienteers across the U.S. and Canada to events, ideas, maps, debates, and one another. We believe this history is worth preserving for future generations.

In discussions with the former publishers, we have learned that the primary obstacle may be copyright. While the magazine itself was published by dedicated individuals, many of the articles and photographs were contributed by freelancers. A key legal consideration is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision (New York Times Co. v. Tasini), which addressed how publishers may reuse freelance content in digital formats. The Court ruled that publishers generally do not automatically hold digital rights to freelance articles or photographs that originally appeared in print. In particular, reproducing individual works in electronic databases or searchable systems typically requires the contributor’s permission.

As another year comes to a close, I’m reminded that navigating unfamiliar terrain is at the heart of orienteering – and of our community. It’s an adventure that challenges us, connects us, and inspires us to keep moving forward together. At Orienteering USA, our focus remains clear: to strengthen our community, expand access to the sport, and ensure a vibrant future for orienteering in the United States.

Thanks to the dedication of our volunteers, clubs, athletes, and supporters, we’ve made meaningful progress this year – and the momentum continues to build.

We’re strengthening services that help our community thrive. From website improvements and universal access to Livelox, to expanded educational resources, youth programming, coaching and mapper development, and monthly online forums, we’re working to make it easier for clubs, volunteers, and athletes to succeed. We’re also collaborating with Sport:80 to build a modern membership database that will better support both OUSA and our clubs, while continuing to invest in our junior and senior national teams across all disciplines.

At the same time, we’re driving innovation and growth. OUSA is preparing the next generation of leaders by funding training for organizers, coaches, and mappers, and by expanding outreach to educators, scouts, and new communities. In 2026, we’ll continue funding projects that encourage new ideas, help reach new audiences, and strengthen local orienteering across the country.

Looking ahead, we’re preparing to welcome the world. In December 2026, Tucson will host the North American Orienteering Championships, bringing competitors from around the globe to compete for age-group titles and providing key qualification opportunities for our elite athletes for the World Games and World Orienteering Championships. We’re also laying the groundwork for the World Trail Orienteering Championships in Los Angeles – the first time this event will be held outside of Europe or Asia – and for orienteering’s inclusion in the first ever U.S.-hosted World Military Summer Games in Charlotte in 2027.

As we look toward the year ahead, I’m inspired by what we’re building together. Thank you for being part of this journey and for everything you do to support orienteering locally, nationally, and on the world stage.

With gratitude and optimism for the future,

Tori Campbell

President, Orienteering USA

This is an insightful piece brought to us by orienteering coach Alex Azarov.

This writing is about the U.S. Champs in Massachusetts in October, specifically the Online Course Review. During that on-line session (recording can be found here ), a few legs from all three competition days were discussed. For each leg, the discussion followed a similar pattern: a couple of route choices were presented, and then comments were made such as “here you had to climb a steep slope,” “running was slow because of stony ground,” or “if you went left you’d have a longer but faster route, though with fewer distinct features for precise navigation.” These are not exact quotes, but you get the idea.

For me, this type of discussion wasn’t very interesting. I found myself thinking, “What am I supposed to learn from this?” There were no conclusions drawn about individual legs and no summary of the discussion as a whole. I want to emphasize that I’m not criticizing the presenters; I’m simply explaining why it wasn’t engaging for me. Such discussions can still be useful in some cases, for example:

• Sprint orienteering, where analyzing 10-meter differences or the number of turns is normal and helpful.
• Beginners, who need to see the factors that go into making route choices.

However, this writing is not about route choice.

I was bored and about to leave when suddenly Peter Gagarin asked a very important question. On the recording this happens at around 1h27m. The question concerned one very simple leg from the middle course: Why did so many people mess up such an easy leg?

Wow! That is exactly the kind of question orienteers should be asking. Peter offered his own answer: “probably people don’t check their compasses enough.”

I agree — that is the right answer. But wait… is it actually useful?

Imagine I’m a beginner and someone tells me I’m not checking my compass often enough. What should I do next time? Check it every 15 seconds? Every 20 meters? What is “enough”? The honest answer is: it depends on the situation. You think back to similar situations, draw on your experience, and try to check your compass more frequently when needed. Afterward you analyze the result and adjust. This trial-and-error approach works — but it takes a long time before you see improvement.

Let’s think further. You really need to check your compass in two situations:

1. When running on a compass bearing and you reach the limit of visibility from your previous reference point.
2. When changing direction, i.e., making a turn.

The first case is straightforward. The second is more interesting. You change direction when you reach or leave a linear feature such as a trail, stream, vegetation boundary, or marsh edge. You could form a habit of checking your compass every time you reach or leave a linear feature.

But there is another situation: you may also need to turn without linear features, such as when you’re going around a hill, a thick vegetation area, a marsh, or any other area feature you want to avoid. In this case, the point where you need to turn is somewhere in the woods, not marked by anything obvious.

Here is the crucial part:
To make a turn and check your compass at the right moment, you must already know in advance that you need to turn at that point. In other words, you must plan it. You must have a clear plan.

This, I believe, is the real answer to the situation discussed during the Course Review. The majority of people who made mistakes on that leg simply did not have a clear plan and therefore did not know they needed to check their compass at the right moment. I say “majority” rather than “all” because it is possible to have a plan and still fail to locate your intended turning point. But in my experience, if you truly want to find a point — because you read it on the map and planned for it — you will find it 99% of the time. You can test this yourself.

So, the real answer is: you check your compass when your plan tells you to check it.

The beauty of this resolution is that you can train in the habit of always having a clear plan. You must monitor yourself continuously on the course. Every time you realize you are moving without a clear plan, say to yourself: “Stop! I won’t move until I decide on a plan.”

In conclusion, I can promise that if you follow this recommendation, you will make far fewer mistakes in the woods.